Heya, If XHTML isn't necessary for Prototype, I'd suggest we change the doctype of the examples and unit tests.
What doctype do you use? You've been using and contributing to Prototype for a long time, I'll totally jump ship to whatever you're using. -- T.J. :-) On Jun 15, 8:50 pm, kangax <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 15, 3:48 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > I thought it wouldn't come as a surprise that using XHTML makes no > > > sense... > > > Hey, HTML and CSS make no sense, let alone XHTML. But that's OT. :-) > > I'm just saying, the doctype that seems to be recommended is XHTML > > transitional, so that's what I use as I don't have a strong reason for > > I would certainly not recommend any type of XHTML doctype (when > designing apps for general web). I don't see a reason for Prototype to > recommend or encourage it either. As I said, there's no point in using > xhtml 99% of the time (for the reasons described well in that > article). That's pretty much all I'm saying ;) > > [...] > > -- > kangax --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
