10 anos é muito mais razoável do que 3 ou 5 como quer o partido pirata.
Nelson Ferraz wrote: > Palavras do Richard Stallman sobre o assunto: > > "One important dimension of copyright is its duration, which is now > typically on the order of a century. Reducing the monopoly on copying to > ten years, starting from the date when a work is published, would be a > good first step. Another aspect of copyright, which covers the making of > derivative works, could continue for a longer period. (...) > > Why ten years? Because that is a safe proposal; we can be confident on > practical grounds that this reduction would have little impact on the > overall viability of publishing today. In most media and genres, > successful works are very profitable in just a few years, and even > successful works are usually out of print well before ten. Even for > reference works, whose useful life may be many decades, ten-year > copyright should suffice: updated editions are issued regularly, and > many readers will buy the copyrighted current edition rather than copy a > ten-year-old public domain version. > > Ten years may still be longer than necessary; once things settle down, > we could try a further reduction to tune the system. At a panel on > copyright at a literary convention, where I proposed the ten-year term, > a noted fantasy author sitting beside me objected vehemently, saying > that anything beyond five years was intolerable." > > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/misinterpreting-copyright.html > _______________________________________________ PSL-Brasil mailing list PSL-Brasil@listas.softwarelivre.org http://listas.softwarelivre.org/mailman/listinfo/psl-brasil Regras da lista: http://twiki.softwarelivre.org/bin/view/PSLBrasil/RegrasDaListaPSLBrasil
