Re: lsh at gnu.org.

[Niels M�ller]

Phillip Rulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> IMO, the standard ought to be Kerberos (|Heimdal).  [ls]sh just encrypts,
> it doesn't do the authentication the way Kerberos does.  I'm not wild
> about having 47 different ways to get into these machines.  I don't want
> to sound like a BOFH but it is easier to manage 1 or 2 methods than
> many.

Currently, LSH only does password and publickey authentication (and
you can disable one of them with an option to lshd). Kerberos and SRP
for user authentication is on the TODO list. As a user, I kindof like
flexibility.

/Niels