On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Phillip Rulon wrote: > Last I heard RMS wasn't to keen on OpenSSH. I don't think he said no, but > this came up some time ago and I think we decided to stick with Kerberos > and opie until lsh was ready. I forget the detail, a patent or something. The GNU project can't use a RSA based system before Sep 20th this year. RSA is patented and the reason why kerberos has been installed was due to this patent and the non-free ssh v1. Werner
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Martin Hamilton
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Hugo Gayosso
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Werner Koch
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Martin Hamilton
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Werner Koch
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
