-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 14-Mar-2000 Phillip Rulon wrote:
[...]
> IMO, the standard ought to be Kerberos (|Heimdal). [ls]sh just encrypts,
> it doesn't do the authentication the way Kerberos does. I'm not wild
> about having 47 different ways to get into these machines. I don't want
> to sound like a BOFH but it is easier to manage 1 or 2 methods than
> many.
I agree with this 1 or 2 methods should be enough, if we offer more methods, we
have more holes to patch later on.
>
> Besides, I like Kerberos :^)
While not being a Kerberos expert I think that Kerberos is the way to go as our
main access point, and lsh as the backup.
Greetings,
- -----------------------
Hugo Gayosso
Support the "Free Software", support The GNU Project
http://hgayosso.linuxbox.com
http://www.gnu.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4zZ8iMNObVRBZveYRAhiPAJ4kztIQ/gYDe6EuFWFQkiiPWrd7jgCfYvAV
haptrbS6O7xwLYQWHHt6hLU=
=DEz5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
