On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:57:23AM -0500, Phillip Rulon wrote: > lsh is GPL software, sure it's still beta and there is a risk in using > it, but it's clear that GNU should be an early adopter. How else can we > expect others to use it if we are not activly testing it? I don't look > forward to a hole in lsh, but, if there is one, I strongly hope it is > we who discover it. I don't know about "strongly hope"..... =) -- There is no sin except stupidity. - Oscar Wilde
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Dave Dykstra
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Martin Hamilton
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Hugo Gayosso
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Werner Koch
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Martin Hamilton
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Werner Koch
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
