On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 01:46:22PM -0500, Phillip Rulon wrote: > Provide equivalent functionality with lsh. Does it do RSA key > authentication, etc? If so, we should first configure it to run lsh > primarily and the hand off to ssh on failure. That way lsh is given > preferential treatment. Then we can test the connection and make sure > that it will actually run. > > The point is that RSA is the problem. Sorry, I meant RSA-like authentication. I'm don't care how it does it. How is kerberos not RSA-like authentication in a way that actually matters substantially from a user's perspective?
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Thomas Bushnell, BSG
