On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 10:23:09AM -0500, Phillip Rulon wrote:

Adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] to this list, I hadn't realized it wasn't 
there.  Gord: I can provide you with any back emails if you'd like.

>    > Once lsh is working well, I'm not sure if there will be any particular
>    > reason why anyone would need to use openssh.
> 
>    The biggest thing is that most of the people currently writing to 
>    repositories on subversions are already currently using ssh.  I don't 
>    know that it will be easy to convince them to change.
> 
> This is an unfortunate development.  It's much more difficult to take something
> away than not to have offered it in the first place.  I wish this had been looked
> at before it was deployed.  Options please.

Provide equivalent functionality with lsh.  Does it do RSA key 
authentication, etc?  If so, we should first configure it to run lsh 
primarily and the hand off to ssh on failure.  That way lsh is given 
preferential treatment.  Then we can test the connection and make sure 
that it will actually run.

After that, we should contact folks individually and explain that we want 
to make a shift to a Free package and work with them individually on this.

Gord, do you want to do the package install, or should I? [Or is there 
sufficient dissention to not go ahead with this?]

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

-- 
There is no sin except stupidity.
 - Oscar Wilde

Reply via email to