Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Niels Mvller wrote: > > > providing a command to execute on the lsh command line. Next version > > will. > > Any idea how long? That would help us plan this out. I'm just checking in a (mostly untested) lsh-0.9.1. So it depends on how many serious bugs there are, and how dangerous we want to live. Getting it as stable as 0.9 could well take a month or at least a few weeks more. /Niels
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Phillip Rulon
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Jeff Bailey
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Joel N. Weber II
- Re: lsh at gnu.org. Thomas Bushnell, BSG
