Most DAWs have a way of using time compression and expansion to quantize audio these days. If Pro Tools and Reaper licenses Elastic Audio , Logic uses their FlexTime algorithm. It can be done in reaper as well yes. The problem is the efficient ways of doing this is A( very visual, and B( those tools may not be accessible so part of it is knowing the daw well enough and having enough time on your hands to figure out and execute said work arounds. All 3 DAW’s can do it so pick your poison and get to work, or just pay a sighted counter part to do it for you.
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'd do it in Reaper, but I'm not totally advanced enough with it to know what > I'm doing. > > Also, how would I quantize things? I can't, as it's audio, not midi. > > Chris. > --- > Christopher Gilland > Co-founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries > > http://www.gshministry.org <http://www.gshministry.org/> > (980) 500-9575 >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: TheOreoMonster <mailto:[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:22 PM >> Subject: Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime! >> >> I imagine once he got the tempo following along to the subtle tempo changes >> if the right elastic audio algorithm is selected and then all the tempo >> changes selected and changed to the same value the audio should playback at >> the set tempo then. Just going by what I remember from using ProTOols. The >> really time consuming way to do this would be to select every actual >> measure of the song, split it to its own clip, and quantize it to whatever >> tempo you want. I have done something like what Chris is attempting to do >> in logic and these days I am a little bit more familiar with Flex time than >> ProTools elastic audio implementation so this was just suggestions based off >> how I have worked around different tools not being accessible in different >> DAWs over the years. >> >>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 6:38 PM, Slau Halatyn <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> I know of no way of achieving this as a blind user. A sighted user might >>> possibly be able to drop warp markers at each bar/beat and then quantize to >>> a fixed tempo. I'm not sure how this might specifically work. Is it >>> important that everything be at a constant tempo? I mean, you could easily >>> create bar/beat markers and the click would simply follow along with the >>> original subtle tempo changes. >>>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I asked this a while back on list, but don't recall ever getting a >>>> definite direct answer. >>>> >>>> I have a song which has been professionally recorded, though without a >>>> click track. I have absolutely no control over this, as it was done by a >>>> very famous country music artist. >>>> >>>> Obviously, though fairly steady, the song does waver a bit with tempo. I >>>> therefore cannot set a constant 4/4 time tempo to say, 90 BPM. I'm not >>>> even sure that is! the tempo for the song. I'm only using that as a random >>>> number. The point being, it may vary from 90 to say, 92 in a few places, >>>> or maybe 88 in others, etc. Point being, the tempo isn't exactly totally >>>> on the click track. >>>> >>>> What I am aiming for here, is to find a way that I can somehow tempo beat >>>> map the song then time stretch/collapse so that the entire song is all the >>>> way through on that constant tempo. This way, if I added a click track, >>>> then set it to the determined tempo, the metronome would follow the whole >>>> way through and not get out of sync. >>>> >>>> Is there a way in ProTools that I can accomplish this, even if it be a >>>> royal pain in the ass to do? >>>> >>>> Chris. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>> email to [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout >> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
