Dan Connolly wrote:
Mark Birbeck wrote:
Hi Dan,
There's no obligation to include the @profile value in a document that
uses RDFa,
Well, the spec says there is some obligation:
There's agreement on the RDFa team that we meant this to be encouraged,
not obligated. If we used the wrong terminology for this, then it's a
bug in how we're using the terminology, not an agreement that this be an
obligation. I know we've clearly stated that before on the mailing list
and specifically in my response to Sean [1] that the entire Working
Group saw, so let's not play word games :)
-Ben
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0024.html