I don't mind, but I would love to understand just what GRDDL people
(Dan?) think will magically happen if there is a profile parameter. The
profile value we have defined should at this point be meaningless to any
GRDDL processor, and there is nothing I know of that would implement
GRDDL for RDFa that the working group has blessed. What am I missing
(this time) ?
Ben Adida wrote:
Ivan Herman wrote:
+1 (including an extra test without)
As long as we have at least one test without, I'm okay with adding
@profile to the test cases.
-Ben
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
