public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Danny Ayers
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Danny Ayers
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Toby Inkster
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Danny Ayers
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Danny Ayers
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Danny Ayers
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Elias Torres
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Ian Hickson
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Elias Torres
  • Re: Why bound prefixes are an anti-pattern in language design Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Minutes for July 30th, 2009 RDFa Telecon Martin McEvoy
• New HTML5 spec-editing tools released Manu Sporny
  • Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released Joe D Williams
  • Re: New HTML5 spec-editing tools released Manu Sporny
• Microdata Revisited Martin McEvoy
  • Re: [whatwg] Microdata Revisited Jonas Sicking
• Suggestions for RDFa 1.1 dorian taylor
• Re: [DRAFT] Heartbeat poll Manu Sporny
  • xmlns in the HTML5 DOM (was Re: [DRAFT] Heartbeat poll) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Manu Sporny
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Joe D Williams
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ben Adida
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ben Adida
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ian Hickson
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Manu Sporny
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ian Hickson
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Michael Hausenblas
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ian Hickson
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Michael Hausenblas
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ben Adida
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Joe D Williams
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ian Hickson
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ben Adida
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Julian Reschke
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ian Hickson
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Julian Reschke
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ian Hickson
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Shelley Powers
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Leif Halvard Silli
  • RE: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) John Foliot
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • RE: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) John Foliot
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ben Adida
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ben Adida
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Sam Ruby
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Maciej Stachowiak
  • Re: Publishing a new draft (HTML5+RDFa) Ian Hickson
• Search Monkey and Bing deal? Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-226: [editorial] various typos/mistakes in Primer SWD Issue Tracker
• An Editor Elias Torres
• PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Ben Adida
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Shane McCarron
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Jeni Tennison
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Manu Sporny
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Ivan Herman
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Manu Sporny
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Jeni Tennison
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Ben Adida
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Jeni Tennison
  • Re: PROPOSAL from telecon on XMLLiteral Ben Adida
• meeting record: 2009-07-23 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force telecon Michael Hausenblas
• telecon in < 1 hour Ben Adida
  • Re: telecon in < 1 hour Shane McCarron
  • Re: telecon in < 1 hour Michael Hausenblas
• A New Way Forward for HTML5 Manu Sporny
• meeting record: 2009-07-16 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: xmlns in HTML5 Henri Sivonen
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Shane McCarron
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Henri Sivonen
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Sam Ruby
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Shane McCarron
• an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Ben Adida
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Michael Hausenblas
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Ben Adida
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Toby A Inkster
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Ivan Herman
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Ben Adida
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Toby A Inkster
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Ivan Herman
  • Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix" (was: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity) Doug Schepers
  • Re: Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix" Martin McEvoy
  • Re: Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix" Ben Adida
  • Re: Please Don't Use the Name "@prefix" Doug Schepers
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Martin McEvoy
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Martin McEvoy
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Ben Adida
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Martin McEvoy
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Martin McEvoy
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Michael Hausenblas
  • why not @profile? (Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity) Martin McEvoy
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Doug Schepers
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Shane McCarron
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Martin McEvoy
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Mark Birbeck
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Manu Sporny
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Manu Sporny
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity -- the security angle Ben Adida
  • Re: an alternative for microformat-like simplicity Martin McEvoy
• RDFa Community ToDo list Manu Sporny
• meeting record: 2009-07-09 RDFa Task Force Ralph R. Swick
• Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC Ben Adida
  • Re: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC Shane McCarron
  • xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Manu Sporny
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Sam Ruby
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Julian Reschke
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Toby A Inkster
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Toby A Inkster
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Julian Reschke
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Toby Inkster
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Julian Reschke
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Shane McCarron
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Toby Inkster
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Dan Brickley
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Shane McCarron
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Ian Hickson
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 (was: Telecon Agenda- Thursday 1500 UTC) Steven Pemberton
  • Re: xmlns in HTML5 Shane McCarron
• HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published Manu Sporny
  • link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published Julian Reschke
  • Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published Mark Birbeck
  • Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published Steven Pemberton
  • Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published Mark Birbeck
  • Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: link/@rel=profile, was: HTML5+RDFa first Editors Draft published Murray Maloney
• RDFa Bookmarklets as Firefox Ubiquity commands Nathan Yergler
  • Re: RDFa Bookmarklets as Firefox Ubiquity commands Michael Hausenblas
  • Re: RDFa Bookmarklets as Firefox Ubiquity commands Nathan Yergler
• Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes Mark Birbeck
  • Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes Julian Reschke
  • Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes Simon Reinhardt
  • Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes Toby A Inkster
  • Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes Manu Sporny
  • Re: Proposal for allowing URIs in CURIE-only attributes Ivan Herman
• adding reification ids publicayers
  • Re: adding reification ids Simon Reinhardt
  • Re: adding reification ids Mark Birbeck
  • Re: adding reification ids Dan Brickley
  • Re: Re: adding reification ids publicayers
  • Re: adding reification ids publicayers

• Earlier messages
• Later messages