On 6 Jul 2011, at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Hi Hixie,
> 
> On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be
>>> addressed before publishing a new LCWD?
>> Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the
>> prioritisation of the bug fixing process? This is getting ridiculous.
> 
> I think we all realize you have issues with the W3C's TR process. I actually 
> agree with some of your view points [at least as I understand them ;-)] and I 
> think they should be discussed with a different set of people then WebApps.  
> For instance, the so-called Advisory Board [AdvBrd] "manages the evolution of 
> the W3C Process Document", yet I suspect very few of them are subscribed to 
> public-webapps.
> 
> So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on public-webapps, 
> I would appreciate it if you would please move TR process type discussions to 
> another Public list.
> 
> IJ, PLH - what Public list is appropriate for discussions about the TR 
> process?

There is no list with a public archive. One thing to do is use process-issues 
and cc www-archive if you wish.

Ian

> 
> -AB
> 
> [AdvBrd] http://www.w3.org/2002/ab/
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs (i...@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447


Reply via email to