On 6 Jul 2011, at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Hixie, > > On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be >>> addressed before publishing a new LCWD? >> Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the >> prioritisation of the bug fixing process? This is getting ridiculous. > > I think we all realize you have issues with the W3C's TR process. I actually > agree with some of your view points [at least as I understand them ;-)] and I > think they should be discussed with a different set of people then WebApps. > For instance, the so-called Advisory Board [AdvBrd] "manages the evolution of > the W3C Process Document", yet I suspect very few of them are subscribed to > public-webapps. > > So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on public-webapps, > I would appreciate it if you would please move TR process type discussions to > another Public list. > > IJ, PLH - what Public list is appropriate for discussions about the TR > process?
There is no list with a public archive. One thing to do is use process-issues and cc www-archive if you wish. Ian > > -AB > > [AdvBrd] http://www.w3.org/2002/ab/ > > > > -- Ian Jacobs (i...@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447