On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:50:48 +0200, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on
public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR
process type discussions to another Public list.
I'm not asking to have a discussion about it at all; I'm asking that you
stop trying to prioritise my work based on it.
in so far as the Web Apps group is currently chartered under the existing
W3C process, and you are an editor of some specs under the terms of that
charter, I find it hard to understand what us unreasonable about
prioritising the work of the group (some of which you have volunteered to
do) according to the existing agreements about how the group functions.
For what it's worth, I am a member of the Advisory Board, and in that
capacity I share some of your concerns. I, and I believe the advisory
board as a whole, would appreciate you taking the time to make some
proposals on process to that forum - a...@w3.org with a cc to e.g.
www-archive if you want a public track. As an employee of a W3C member,
you could also ask your member representative (TV Raman) to present
concerns through the Advisory Committee forum.
Whether you chose to do so or not, these issues are being followed in the
relevant fora - but this group isn't really it.
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com