Hi Hixie,
On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be
addressed before publishing a new LCWD?
Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the
prioritisation of the bug fixing process? This is getting ridiculous.
I think we all realize you have issues with the W3C's TR process. I
actually agree with some of your view points [at least as I understand
them ;-)] and I think they should be discussed with a different set of
people then WebApps. For instance, the so-called Advisory Board
[AdvBrd] "manages the evolution of the W3C Process Document", yet I
suspect very few of them are subscribed to public-webapps.
So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on
public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR
process type discussions to another Public list.
IJ, PLH - what Public list is appropriate for discussions about the TR
process?
-AB
[AdvBrd] http://www.w3.org/2002/ab/
