Thanks for your clarifications Aryeh. One follow-up below re
"contributions" to the Editing spec ...
On 9/22/11 12:43 PM, ext Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Arthur Barstow<art.bars...@nokia.com> wrote:
It seems to me, that by virtue of using public-webapps, it does give WebApps
WG a role e.g. to at least comment on the CG's editing spec. [Whether such a
role is "official" or not is probably just "splitting hairs".]
I absolutely would like*comments* from everyone who's interested,
whether individuals or organizations or Working Groups.
It appears you are intentionally using "comments" here to differentiate
"contributions". Is that right?
I ask because, as I understand the CG process: before a person can make
a contribution to a CG spec, they must agree to a CLA for all of the
CG's specs; and a CG is only supposed to accept contributions from its
CG members.
If your CG uses WebApps' list, how will contributions from non-CG people
be managed/tracked and how will the FSA be managed e.g. if non-CG
contributions are accepted?
-AB
