Yes, WebSockets was missing - I've gone ahead and updated the spec to include it.
Thanks for sharing the links, the content is well thought out. In particular, your diagram does a good job summarizing some of the key consumers and producers that come to play regarding Streams. I'll review it in detail. DataChannels also seem like a possible candidate, although I'm not yet very familiar with them. This can be something reviewed and thought through, and added accordingly. > Who is coordinating each group that should get involved? MediaStream for >example should be based on the Stream interface and all related streams >proposals. Once we come to a consensus in the WG what Streams look like and their role, we can begin to coordinate what the impact is on other groups. Thanks, Feras ---------------------------------------- > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:05:22 +1100 > From: rob...@mob-labs.com > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Re: CfC: publish WD of Streams API; deadline Nov 3 > > Along with WebSockets as Aymeric mentioned...WebRTC DataChannels are > also missing. > > And I think Aymeric's point about MediaStream is important too...but > there is very strong push-back from within the Media Capture & Streams > TF that they don't think this is relevant 8/ > > Also, here's a couple of links for things I've shared/proposed recently > related to this. > > public message > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013Sep/0229.html > > presentation > http://www.slideshare.net/robman/web-standards-for-ar-workshop-at-ismar13 > > code > https://github.com/buildar/getting_started_with_webrtc#image_processing_pipelinehtml > > > All thoughts and feedback welcome. > > > roBman > > > On 29/10/13 10:22 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote: >> I have suggested some additions/changes in my latest reply to the >> Overlap thread. >> >> The list of streams producers/consumers is not final but obviously >> WebSockets are missing. >> >> Who is coordinating each group that should get involved? MediaStream >> for example should be based on the Stream interface and all related >> streams proposals. >> >> Regards, >> >> Aymeric >> >> Le 28/10/2013 16:29, Arthur Barstow a écrit : >>> Feras and Takeshi have begun merging their Streams proposal and this >>> is a Call for Consensus to publish a new WD of Streams API using the >>> updated ED as the basis: >>> >>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm> >>> >>> Please note the Editors may update the ED before the TR is published >>> (but they do not intend to make major changes during the CfC). >>> >>> Agreement to this proposal: a) indicates support for publishing a new >>> WD; and b) does not necessarily indicate support of the contents of >>> the WD. >>> >>> If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please >>> reply to this e-mail by November 3 at the latest. Positive response >>> to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed >>> to mean agreement with the proposal. >>> >>> -Thanks, ArtB >>> >> > >