Agreed. Some of the points listed appear to be things already addressed. Takeshi and I have some feedback on the initial mail, but will wait and provide thoughts on the proposal instead. Looking forward to seeing it.
________________________________ > From: tyosh...@google.com > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:18:47 +0900 > To: ann...@annevk.nl > CC: dome...@domenicdenicola.com; art.bars...@nokia.com; firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Re: publish WD of Streams API; deadline Nov 3 > > OK. There seems to be some disconnect, but I'm fine with waiting for > Domenic's proposal first. > > Takeshi > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Anne van Kesteren > <ann...@annevk.nl<mailto:ann...@annevk.nl>> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Domenic Denicola > <dome...@domenicdenicola.com<mailto:dome...@domenicdenicola.com>> wrote: >> I have concrete suggestions as to what such an API could look > like—and, more importantly, how its semantics would significantly > differ from this one—which I hope to flesh out and share more broadly > by the end of this weekend. However, since the call for comments phase > has commenced, I thought it important to voice these objections as soon > as possible. > > Given how long we have been trying to figure out streams, waiting a > little longer to see Domenic's proposal should be fine I think. No > need to start rushing things through the process now. (Although on the > flipside at some point we will need to start shipping something.) > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > >