Agreed. Some of the points listed appear to be things already addressed. 
Takeshi and I have some feedback on the initial mail, but will wait and provide 
thoughts on the proposal instead. Looking forward to seeing it.

________________________________
> From: tyosh...@google.com 
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:18:47 +0900 
> To: ann...@annevk.nl 
> CC: dome...@domenicdenicola.com; art.bars...@nokia.com; public-webapps@w3.org 
> Subject: Re: publish WD of Streams API; deadline Nov 3 
> 
> OK. There seems to be some disconnect, but I'm fine with waiting for 
> Domenic's proposal first. 
> 
> Takeshi 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Anne van Kesteren 
> <ann...@annevk.nl<mailto:ann...@annevk.nl>> wrote: 
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Domenic Denicola 
> <dome...@domenicdenicola.com<mailto:dome...@domenicdenicola.com>> wrote: 
>> I have concrete suggestions as to what such an API could look 
> like—and, more importantly, how its semantics would significantly 
> differ from this one—which I hope to flesh out and share more broadly 
> by the end of this weekend. However, since the call for comments phase 
> has commenced, I thought it important to voice these objections as soon 
> as possible. 
> 
> Given how long we have been trying to figure out streams, waiting a 
> little longer to see Domenic's proposal should be fine I think. No 
> need to start rushing things through the process now. (Although on the 
> flipside at some point we will need to start shipping something.) 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://annevankesteren.nl/ 
> 
>                                         

Reply via email to