On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 6/11/15 4:32 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>> I noticed that the CSS Color Module Level 4 actually does this, and it
>> seems pretty nice:
>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-color/#dom-rgbcolor-rgbcolorcolor
> I should note that the ES code there produces semantics that don't match the
> IDL in this spec (or is complete nonsense, depending on how literally you
> choose to read it).

I think we should pick the complete nonsense interpretation as we try
to be precise.

If you use IDL you cannot use ES since the pipeline is ES -> IDL ->
prose that operates on IDL values -> IDL -> ES. Skipping IDL
altogether might be okay, but the infrastructure is not there yet, and
it's way more difficult to get things right.

> I would actually prefer some sort of pseudocode that is _not_ JS-looking,
> just so people don't accidentally screw this up.

If we had more resources I could imagine IDL 1) matching ES-syntax
more and 2) define a bunch of abstract operations that specifications
can use to define their features.


Reply via email to