On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
>> Why?
> I think the rationale was mentioned in
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JulSep/0367.html>.

Ms2ger made a valid point. Workers is actively being updated (I
submitted two PRs the other day, more to come). If you don't want to
get out-of-sync you won't get to REC in the foreseeable future. It
therefore is likely a waste of time for someone to volunteer to
copy-and-paste text that is unstable.


Reply via email to