> On 22 Sep, 2015, at 1:35 am, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
>>> Why?
>> I think the rationale was mentioned in
>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JulSep/0367.html>.
> Ms2ger made a valid point. Workers is actively being updated (I
> submitted two PRs the other day, more to come). If you don't want to
> get out-of-sync you won't get to REC in the foreseeable future. It
> therefore is likely a waste of time for someone to volunteer to
> copy-and-paste text that is unstable.

Thanks for explaining the situation :)

If the spec is still changing frequently, indeed it isn't a good idea to 
publish another CR… but the WebApps WG needs to clearly tell the community that 
the 2012 CR should be considered obsolete. 

I’d suggest that we publish a WD for Workers, which adapts to the current 
changes and revise the 2012 CR. The community is encouraged to refer to either 
the WHATWG version or the new WD. 


> -- 
> https://annevankesteren.nl/

Reply via email to