And on the last call, it was requested we have more actionable objectives for these, particularly since the general question is "Any updates"
For example, we could leverage this time before the call to identify what ballots have updates, and focus the discussion on those. If there are no updates, then knowing before the call is useful. I presume you intend this for the Ballot proposer to speak to? As noted, these calls are an expensive use of everyone's time. As much as possible, we should try to optimize for keeping them short and actionable. I'm not objecting to discussion if there's items to discuss - I'm just requesting we take a more considered approach to our agendas and make sure we only discuss things for which there is new information or pertinence to discuss. On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Kirk Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > We always review the status of ballots. > > >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
