I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7 breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the dependency into our repos.
[0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46 David On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <pcre...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote: > > Folks, > > > > We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it > possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2]. > > > > This has broken the EL7 builds > > So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that > aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for > maintaining our EL7 support. > > I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any > significant period of time. Perhaps some discussions need to happen to > have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time > untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo. > > > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected. > > > > Cheers, > > milan > > > > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45 > > [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122 > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-dev mailing list > > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev