Folks, It seems to me the F26 CI is still broken: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/RVrMq9GoBbiFfbqHVm03mA https://pulpadmin.fedorapeople.org/jenkins/jobs/unittest-pulp_rpm-pr/builds/1155/node-type=f26-np.txt But do we need F26? It's been unmaintained IIRC for about a month already.
-- milan On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Milan Kovacik <mkova...@redhat.com> wrote: > David, Patrick > > thanks for handling this! > > -- > milan > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:10 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> @milan, I thought you were gone for the day so I went ahead and opened a >> PR to package libsolv: >> >> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47 >> <https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47/commits> >> >> After it’s merged, I think RHEL should be good and hopefully your PR will >> pass as well. >> >> David >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:35 PM Milan Kovacik <mkova...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the feedback guys! >>> >>> @David, what in particular needs doing to carry the libsolv in Pulp >>> repos? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> milan >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:52 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7 >>>> breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while >>>> @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the >>>> dependency into our repos. >>>> >>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46 >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <pcre...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote: >>>>> > Folks, >>>>> > >>>>> > We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it >>>>> possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2]. >>>>> > >>>>> > This has broken the EL7 builds >>>>> >>>>> So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that >>>>> aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for >>>>> maintaining our EL7 support. >>>>> >>>>> I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any >>>>> significant period of time. Perhaps some discussions need to happen to >>>>> have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time >>>>> untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo. >>>>> >>>>> > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected. >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> > milan >>>>> > >>>>> > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45 >>>>> > [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122 >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> > Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev____________ >>>>> ___________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>> >>> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev