Thanks for the feedback guys! @David, what in particular needs doing to carry the libsolv in Pulp repos?
Cheers, milan On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:52 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7 > breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change while > @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the > dependency into our repos. > >  https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46 > > David > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <pcre...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote: >> > Folks, >> > >> > We've merged a package dependency requirement update to make it >> possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable. >> > >> > This has broken the EL7 builds >> >> So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that >> aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for >> maintaining our EL7 support. >> >> I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any >> significant period of time. Perhaps some discussions need to happen to >> have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time >> untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo. >> >> > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > milan >> > >> >  https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45 >> >  https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pulp-dev mailing list >> > Pulpemail@example.com >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev_____ >> __________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulpfirstname.lastname@example.org >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulpemail@example.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev