Thanks for the feedback guys!

@David, what in particular needs doing to carry the libsolv in Pulp repos?

Cheers,
milan

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:52 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote:

> I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7
> breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while
> @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the
> dependency into our repos.
>
> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46
>
> David
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <pcre...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote:
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it
>> possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2].
>> >
>> > This has broken the EL7 builds
>>
>> So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that
>> aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for
>> maintaining our EL7 support.
>>
>> I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any
>> significant period of time.  Perhaps some discussions need to happen to
>> have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time
>> untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo.
>>
>> > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > milan
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45
>> > [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pulp-dev mailing list
>> > Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev_____
>> __________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to