We should remove F26 from the testing matrix. This will leave us with F27 and EL7 until we start building F28 packages.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Milan Kovacik <mkova...@redhat.com> wrote: > Folks, > > It seems to me the F26 CI is still broken: https://paste.fedoraproject. > org/paste/RVrMq9GoBbiFfbqHVm03mA https://pulpadmin. > fedorapeople.org/jenkins/jobs/unittest-pulp_rpm-pr/builds/ > 1155/node-type=f26-np.txt > But do we need F26? It's been unmaintained IIRC for about a month already. > > -- > milan > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Milan Kovacik <mkova...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> David, Patrick >> >> thanks for handling this! >> >> -- >> milan >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:10 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> @milan, I thought you were gone for the day so I went ahead and opened a >>> PR to package libsolv: >>> >>> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47 >>> <https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47/commits> >>> >>> After it’s merged, I think RHEL should be good and hopefully your PR >>> will pass as well. >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:35 PM Milan Kovacik <mkova...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the feedback guys! >>>> >>>> @David, what in particular needs doing to carry the libsolv in Pulp >>>> repos? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> milan >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:52 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7 >>>>> breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while >>>>> @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the >>>>> dependency into our repos. >>>>> >>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46 >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <pcre...@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote: >>>>>> > Folks, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it >>>>>> possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2]. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > This has broken the EL7 builds >>>>>> >>>>>> So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that >>>>>> aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for >>>>>> maintaining our EL7 support. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any >>>>>> significant period of time. Perhaps some discussions need to happen to >>>>>> have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time >>>>>> untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Cheers, >>>>>> > milan >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45 >>>>>> > [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122 >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>> > Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev____________ >>>>>> ___________________________________ >>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev