Issue #2349 has been updated by Nigel Kersten.
So chatting to one of the Solaris guys here, he seemed to think "preseed" was an acceptable name. Are you happy with me taking this approach? * leaving responsefile there * marking it as deprecated * creating a new "preseed" parameter that can take: * data * posix path "/path/to/preseed.file" * File resource I'm not stuck on "preseed" as the name, and don't particularly care. ---------------------------------------- Feature #2349: apt provider should support 'responsedata' just like 'responsefile' http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2349 Author: Nigel Kersten Status: Needs design decision Priority: Normal Assigned to: Nigel Kersten Category: Target version: Complexity: Unknown Affected version: 0.25.0 Keywords: We're looking to use preseed data with apt a lot more, so have been experimenting with the responsefile parameter for apt, but it's kind of clunky given you have to deliver the file to the client and set up relationships by hand. I'm proposing adding a responsedata parameter where you simply specify this in the puppet manifest itself, rather than relying upon a separate file. As debconf-set-selections accepts input on stdin, this should be trivial to do. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://reductivelabs.com/redmine/my/account --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
