On 10/02/2010 12:39 PM, Aymeric Mansoux wrote:
Bernardo Barros said :
Hi James,
Not sure but I suspect that the problem is not mentioning, but
_encouraging_ the use of non-free software.
It would be good to know then if freeing the default Puredyne ISO from
binary blobs but *still* providing support (as in
forums/lists/scripts/package managers/etc) for people to get their
hardware working when *no* free alternative is possible, would get us
listed on the FSF site.
I don't think it would. Debian is not listed due to facilitating the
installation of non-free software with debian-nonfree.
http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html
A free:dyne version of pure:dyne could be based on Trisquel, which is a
free Ubuntu derivative. I don't think this fits the project's objectives
at the moment though.
- Rob.
---
[email protected]
http://identi.ca/group/puredyne
irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
