Fedora has no non-free software in their repositories. But I think they are not listed because of the fedora kernel itself.
2010/10/2 Rob Myers <[email protected]>: > On 10/02/2010 12:39 PM, Aymeric Mansoux wrote: >> >> Bernardo Barros said : >>> >>> Hi James, >>> >>> Not sure but I suspect that the problem is not mentioning, but >>> _encouraging_ the use of non-free software. >> >> It would be good to know then if freeing the default Puredyne ISO from >> binary blobs but *still* providing support (as in >> forums/lists/scripts/package managers/etc) for people to get their >> hardware working when *no* free alternative is possible, would get us >> listed on the FSF site. > > I don't think it would. Debian is not listed due to facilitating the > installation of non-free software with debian-nonfree. > > http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html > > A free:dyne version of pure:dyne could be based on Trisquel, which is a free > Ubuntu derivative. I don't think this fits the project's objectives at the > moment though. > > - Rob. > > --- > [email protected] > http://identi.ca/group/puredyne > irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne > --- [email protected] http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
