>>But shared storage between different clusters is a problem, because our >>locking mechanism only works inside a cluster. So there must be a single >>cluster which does all allocation for a specific storage??
But if we have unique id (uuid for example), it shouldn't be a problem ? no need to cross clusters storage lock ? ----- Mail original ----- De: "dietmar" <diet...@proxmox.com> À: "aderumier" <aderum...@odiso.com>, "pve-devel" <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com> Cc: "Thomas Lamprecht" <t.lampre...@proxmox.com> Envoyé: Mardi 20 Septembre 2016 17:37:08 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster (100nodes), get rid of corosync ? > On September 20, 2016 at 10:45 AM Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com> > wrote: > > > >>I guess we need more. For example, we can exactly identify > >>a VM/CT/Storage/Network by prefixing it with the cluster name: > >> > >>cluster1/vm/100 > >>cluster2/ct/100 > >>cluster1/storage/local > >>cluster2/network/vmbr > >> > >>But we need a way to tell if resources are considered > >>to be equal (cluster wide). > >> > >>An easy way to to do that would be to assign UUIDs to VMs, CTs, > >>storages and networks? > > > yes, could be the solution. I think openstack/xenserver already doing this. > > The vm disks also need to be unique. (they use vmid, so if vmid is unique > it's > ok) But shared storage between different clusters is a problem, because our locking mechanism only works inside a cluster. So there must be a single cluster which does all allocation for a specific storage?? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel