If we have a good specialization editor, then creating new tags or
frame-based systems would be easy to add. I'd rather not see the
base system get overloaded, and I'm frames-adverse myself.
Mark
>On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > However, how do people feel about a SwikiEditor (similar to Browser for
> > > > Swikis)? Is that necessary for a release? I think I could put
>a decent one
> > > > together in some reasonable amount of time.
>[snip]
> > Most of the swikis I visit are not cool because of their look but
> > because of content. I would say yes to any extension that allows
> > improving how content is structured but I do not see the need to have a
> > WYSIWYG editor in swikis.
>
>I understood "SwikiEditor" to be a thing for editing templates, actions,
>settings, etc. -- i.e., closer to the Admin thing except inside squeak and
>(I would hope) with more capabilities ;) A place to put other admin tools
>(e.g., bulk page migrators, history purgers, etc. etc.)
>
>[snip]
> > !Another extension I would like to have is a way to reload one swiki
> > without shutting down the server. Maybe right from the Admin swiki.
>
>Yes. Indeed, I wouldn't mind this on a page by page (or template by
>template) basis. (Again, something that might work well with an in squeak
>editor as well as with the browser based admin utility.)
>
>Cheers,
>Bijan.
--------------------------
Mark Guzdial : Georgia Tech : College of Computing : Atlanta, GA 30332-0280
Associate Professor - Learning Sciences & Technologies.
Collaborative Software Lab - http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/csl/
(404) 894-5618 : Fax (404) 894-0673 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/people/Faculty/Mark.Guzdial.html
