On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Txema Vicente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it seems the 247 blits are killing fps, too.
> I did say that something was wrong, but I get the same 96 FPS with this
> simple test code, and reducing the range increases drastically fps:
blit() is definitely not designed for high performance. The new graphics
batch and related sprite functionality in pyglet 1.1 *is*.
I thought the performance of blit() was mentioned in the programming guide,
but it's not. I'll add a note now (though it won't be on the website until
an update is pushed out).
Richard
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pyglet-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
