On Oct 6, 2:42 pm, David Eyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * AbstractImage/batch/group integration
I'm afraid that AbstractImage integration just doesn't make sense for SVG. The AbstractImage class is really quite tightly coupled to OpenGL textures, and most of the API simply wouldn't translate to an SVG setting. Batches and groups on the other hand, are on the way. I may even have a bit of a hack on it this evening, if I don't get distracted by a shiny object. > * A project site, for tracking updates, perhaps eventually > documentation? I'll knock something together soon. > * Upload to PyPI? I don't think there's really much benefit to this at present. Squirtle isn't a package, and doesn't belong in a package index. At the moment I'm making no guarantees that different versions of Squirtle are in any way API-compatible. That they all are at present is simply coincidence. The notion of people *installing* current versions of Squirtle, rather than simply including the .py in their project distribution, is probably not a good one for these reasons, and not something I want to encourage right now. > * Zoomable/transformable SVG rendering > * transformable as in stretching and squashing > * perhaps these are already possible; I haven't looked into it. > * perhaps these aren't compatible with the batch/group integration? These are indeed currently possible, check the scale parameter to SVG.draw(). Documentation is in the README. Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
