On Aug 14, 1:47 pm, "Martin O'Leary" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think a lot of this is tied up in the question of where the future > of Pyglet lies. If we're going to be adding heaps of new > functionality, which Richard and Alex are both against, and which I at > least have fairly strong reservations about, then yes, we probably > need a DVCS system. However, if we're considering Pyglet to be roughly > feature-complete, and only talking about bug fixes and minor > enhancements, then the current SVN system seems perfectly acceptable. I don't think SVN is suited if many people want to contribute. 1) if you give everybody commit rights, chaos ensues. 2) if you limit commit access to a small number of people, the whole burden of reviewing/applying patches falls onto their shoulders.
A DVCS is actually better suited to distribute the workload of moving a project forward, whatever the destination, be that less bugs or more features. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
