On Jan 19, 1:29 pm, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 19, 9:20 am, Colin Flanagan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The SQLAlchemy argument is a very compelling one.  I have an application 
> > that, while being a CMS, has heavily relational data.  I was urged by 
> > different people to do it either in Django or Plone, but went with Pylons. 
> > My domain objects are far easier to work with, though I did suffer from the 
> > authentication layer and a few other things I had to build from scratch.
>
> > Django can use SQLAlchemy, but by doing so you pretty much nullify a lot of 
> > the things that are unique to that framework like their "automatic admin 
> > interfaces."  Django's  object generation came nowhere near understanding 
> > my moderately-complicated data model and would have been much more 
> > difficult to develop with, as compared to Pylons with SQLAlchemy.
>
> > On another note:
> > I find it interesting that a lot of people recommend Django for CMS-type 
> > applications.  I would think that Plone might be more far more suitable 
> > given that:
> > 1. your data fits well with the hierarchical structure of the ZODB
> > 2. your content is comparable to the content types already established in 
> > Plone
> > 3. you don't have any legacy data or need to integrate with other systems
> > 4. you don't need to do lots of custom UI/presentation layer work
>
> I'm no Plone expert, but I don't think #4 is a problem for Plone. I
> think there are actually quite a few Plone sites with custom UIs (my
> company's new Intranet being one of them).
>
> And just to add another voice to this SQLAlchemy hurrah, like Colin,
> I'm also doing (complex) GIS stuff with PostGIS (& Shapely & GeoJSON &
> PyProj). Having a bit of experience with both Django and Rails, I
> don't know how I'd accomplish with their ORMs what I can with SA. I'm
> not saying it's not possible, but it seems nowhere near as
> straightforward or flexible.

s/Colin/Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to