On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 12:26 pm, Noah Gift <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Django is like Rails -- it forces you into building certain types of >> > apps with certain styles. >> >> > If you build a Django app , you're pretty much married to it -- and >> > can expect it to work much like other apps. That's not necessarily a >> > bad thing. >> >> > Pylons & SqlAlchemy offer a lot more control. >> >> > One of my websites is 90% ModPerl with 10% pylons offloaded ; we use >> > the same tables & db seamlessly. I don't know if its possible in >> > django - but it was too hard to get done. >> >> > Another one of my projects is 60% Pylons, 20% PHP and 20% MovableType >> > (Perl). Again, Pylons power and flexibility let me seamlessly get all >> > of them working together. >> >> > ( btw , we're *finally* about to release a web framework toolkit based >> > on Pylons that lets people do all this . huge product launches in the >> > next 6 weeks after 1yr of development and testing ). >> >> Jonathan, >> >> This seems like a very interesting set of projects. I wonder if there >> is somewhere people could here, "customer stories" like this in one >> spot. I had no idea people where doing this with Django. > > With Django or with Pylons?
Ah, I meant Pylons :) Maybe this could be done officially or unofficially. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
