I was about to suggest some names as figurehead. Then i realize they might be too busy working :)
Didip On Aug 22, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Noah Gift <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM, john smallberries > <[email protected] > > wrote: > > I strongly agree with you about sqlalchemy being the gateway drug to > pylons. I was just looking for an ORM at the time, and sqlalchemy > stands out as the one to try when you are doing that search. Shortly > afterwards, while I wasn't looing, it just sort of walked me over to > Pylons. > > I think the main thing holding Pylons marketing back is a figurehead > who fits one or all of these characteristics: > > 1. Read "The Fountainhead" and actually took it seriously. > 2. Ego and belief in core technology based on a fictional reality. > 3. Extreme desire for fame, popularity, and acceptance. > 4. Core developers create google alerts for "Pylons" and then get > drunk every weekend and trash people who show up in their google > alert and appear critical of "Pylons". > > Get to work :) > > > -- Will > > > On Aug 21, 9:48 pm, Didip Kerabat <[email protected]> wrote: > > From my experience both are not ridiculously hard to deploy. Even > > though pylons have more options. It's a hard sell on that one, i > > think. On the other hand, isn't django having problem with wsgi? > > > > Also, sqlalchemy has far more value to me than django orm. Can we > > highlight the fact that it is easy to get up to speed in web dev > using > > sqlalchemy? > > > > We can also appeal to front end devs, the same way rails does. > Django > > opinion towards designer hurts them, imo. We should highlight the > fact > > that mako is powerful, easy to use, and doesn't assume that > designers > > are stupid. > > > > My 20 cents, > > > > Didip > > > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Wyatt Baldwin > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 21, 3:35 pm, mickgardner <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> ... > > >> I think one clear advantage that pylons is easily deployed, far > above > > >> Django or other python based apps.. > > > > > Just to make sure I understand... are you saying Pylons apps are > much > > > easier to deploy compared to Django apps? Or are you saying that > they > > > *should* be? I agree with the latter but not the former. > > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Noah > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
