From my experience both are not ridiculously hard to deploy. Even though pylons have more options. It's a hard sell on that one, i think. On the other hand, isn't django having problem with wsgi?
Also, sqlalchemy has far more value to me than django orm. Can we highlight the fact that it is easy to get up to speed in web dev using sqlalchemy? We can also appeal to front end devs, the same way rails does. Django opinion towards designer hurts them, imo. We should highlight the fact that mako is powerful, easy to use, and doesn't assume that designers are stupid. My 20 cents, Didip On Aug 21, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 3:35 pm, mickgardner <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >> I think one clear advantage that pylons is easily deployed, far above >> Django or other python based apps.. > > Just to make sure I understand... are you saying Pylons apps are much > easier to deploy compared to Django apps? Or are you saying that they > *should* be? I agree with the latter but not the former. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
