HMMMM, and yet my company is using pyramid quite successfully where 2 full stack frameworks have failed us.
Clearly something is wrong. :) Thomas G. Willis On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:51 AM, rihad <[email protected]> wrote: > Pfff... I've got a confession to make :) All this "lightweightedness " > makes using Pyramid a bit confusing at first. It's like needing to get > separate Firefox plugins to enable JavaScript, show JPEGs, browse FTP > sites, handle form submission, etc. Dare I say, I find full-stack > frameworks like TG2 more... appealing. Perhaps lightweight frameworks > such as Pyramid are for more advanced usage, although I doubt for > which purpose, given that problems a web programmer faces in his > projects are amazingly the same. In other words, everyone is welcome > to build their own magic framework out of Pyramid as they see fit. > That's not a bad thing at all, if that's what you want :) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
