> > >> Configurator methods to call, just as the docs do now. Theoretically, >> Pyramid may disuse the ZCA in a future major release (although it's >> highly unlikely). >> >> It might also be worth mentioning that dis-using the ZCA would end a lot of my work for our system, and force us to either stay on a frozen version or fork. I do hope to write cookbook stuff on how and why we use the style we use, so I guess take this as a request to be transparent about that possibility, and perhaps not make that decision unilaterally without community discussion and input. One thing I definitely don't want to do is spend time writing documentation and publishing tools that are then rendered either useless or convoluted to use ( as would be the case if we were telling users to add in their own version of the zca registry. I mean, it would be really really really bad for our work. Please do not treat that decision lightly.
Thanks Iain -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
