Sorry, but I don't think any server-side web framework is MVC. People that ask about are generally just using buzz terms like SOA, Web Services, MVC, etc without understanding the concepts. The javascript front-end frameworks are more MVC than the server-side frameworks.
As for the Quick Tour, I'm still a newbie, and found myself overwhelmed with the documentation when I started a year ago. It is still very difficult to digest and the only way I've figured things out is by diving into it head first. For example, class-based views, I still don't grok it. If you are coming from Rails, for example, you can have multiple routes inside a 'class view', but in Pyramid it appears that you can only have one route per class view. At least that is what I've understood just recently, but it is still unclear from the docs. The Quick Tour doesn't help in clearing this up. Would be useful if it were a little more explicit about this. On Sunday, September 1, 2013 12:31:24 PM UTC-6, Chris McDonough wrote: > > On 09/01/2013 02:24 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > > > Especially since, doesn't Rails have MVC frameworks now? I know > > they've been backporting some things from the Python frameworks. > > > > AFAIK, Rails always "had MVC" and was the tip of the "MVC" spear. It > made the term "MVC" popular in relation to web frameworks (as wrong as > the term was). > > - C > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
