Has the same taste as the recent election campaign. Start with
extraordinary and alarming, but totally false and uneducated claims
("Python 3 is not Turing complete", "you can't run Python 2 and Python 3
along with each other" etc.) and conclude that we should revert
everything and do things in the old ways. Same spirit as "climate change
is a hoax, let's continue to burn fossil fuel" or "who needs diversity,
let's continue to make politics for straight white male people only as
we did in the good old 1950s."
My personal experiences with Python 3 are very positive, I do not
perceive things as "broken", but moving into the right direction. Many
mistakes that have been made in the beginning of the transition have
already been fixed. And I see Python 3.6 as another great step forward.
Evolution is good, don't worry, don't be stagnant.
-- Christoph
Am 24.11.2016 um 12:03 schrieb Vinicius Assef:
Hey guys.
As Pyramid was the first framework supporting Python 3, what do you
think about this position?
https://learnpythonthehardway.org/book/nopython3.html
What are your experiences regarding Python 3 as broken?
--
Vinicius Assef
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/cce59e52-512c-9fcd-cbb9-832113a6b2c0%40online.de.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
