On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Zhang, Zhishuang wrote:
I am using this file: "../src/PyLucene-src-2.0.0.tar.gz" from the
website.
From your earlier message, you're probably using this one:
http://downloads.osafoundation.org/PyLucene/src/PyLucene-src-2.0.0-1.tar.gz
(it shows rev 417135 for the Lucene svn rev and that's the most recent
Lucene used with PyLucene builds). Try actually using:
http://downloads.osafoundation.org/PyLucene/src/PyLucene-src-2.0.0.tar.gz
to see if that solves it. If it does the the dates in the 2.0.0-1 tar archive
are wrong (and I need to fix this).
You shouldn't have to edit anything except for the variables documented in
the Makefile.
Andi..
I only uncomment the variable definition section in Makefile. Seems like
there is more I need to modify in order to skip the patching phase.
Anyone can give me a hand here.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andi Vajda
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pylucene-dev] Build on solaris
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Zhang, Zhishuang wrote:
Hi,
I got a message below, and don't what to do. Anyone saw this message
before?
make
mkdir -p release/classes
cd lucene-java-2.0.0-417135; patch -Nup1 < ../patches.lucene; echo ok
Looks like a unified context diff.
File to patch: patches.lucene
No file found -- skip this patch? [no]
File to patch:
If you build PyLucene from the source tarball, you shouldn't have to go
through this patching phase. The Lucene .java source files are already
compiled and the .jar files are provided with the PyLucene source
tarballs.
The problem you're facing is probably due to dates of some of these
files
being wrong and that is confusing make.
Andi..
_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
