On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:53 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is exactly the kind of arbitrary decision making by an insufficiently > representative group that led to us banning making any binding decisions at > language summits: their in-person nature means that they're inherently > exclusive environments that lead to requirements being overlooked and > decisions being made without involving most of the people affected.
Did you see Brett's email here, especially the last few paragraphs? https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2018-September/006100.html I don't know how the Discourse experiment will turn out, and I know it won't make everyone happy, but I hope it works. Because we *know* that what we're doing now is making people miserable and driving them away. The push to try Discourse may or may not be misguided, but it's not coming out of a few people having a whim over lunch together. -n P.S.: I found that link using my usual method for finding mailing list archive links, which is: first I did a search in my local MUA, found the email I wanted, noted the date, then manually went to the mailing list archives and clicked through the messages around that date until I found it. This *sucks*. -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
