Le 29/09/2018 à 12:44, Łukasz Langa a écrit : > > On Sep 29, 2018, at 11:24, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com > <mailto:p.f.mo...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Are committers *not* active in the past two >> releases not considered? Your figures seem biased. (Was I part of that >> 30? I committed some changes in the last 2 releases. Barely anything, >> and I do *not* consider myself very active in terms of code changes, >> but how many tiers are we working with here? People who were at the >> sprints, people "active in the past 2 releases", "the rest"? > > There is discussion *just* about this here: > https://discuss.python.org/t/which-list-of-core-developers-is-authoritative/55 > <https://discuss.python.org/t/which-list-of-core-developers-is-authoritative/55?u=ambv>
It would be nice not to mingle different concerns, though. We may want to have a discussion over what an "active" core developer is (and perhaps reach an official decision if desired), but in the meantime we should avoid using the "active / inactive" distinction when discussing who can voice their opinion on topics such as communication tools. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
