Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

[Sébastien Arnaud]

Hi Graham,

I am using:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/mod_python-3.2.7 $ bash --version
GNU bash, version 3.1.7(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.



Thanks,

Sébastien


On Feb 6, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:

I will look at if I can find later the BASH bug you are referring to. I had the feeling that it was not directly mod_python causing the issue, but that I ought to report the issue, since the problem was not existent when I compiled the latest official release of mod_python (3.1.4)

What version of BASH shell are you using? Can't remember the version, but a particular patch level revision of BASH released recently has a bug in it which causes configure to error. Ie., it is a BASH bug and not mod_python.

Have to run now, so more later.

Graham

On 07/02/2006, at 6:46 AM, Sébastien Arnaud wrote:

Hi,



It is failing during the configure process...


checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for ar... ar
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for main in -lm... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking your blood pressure... a bit high, but we can proceed
configure: checking whether apxs is available...
checking for --with-apxs... /usr/sbin/apxs2 executable, good
checking Apache version... 2.0.55
checking for Apache libexec directory... /usr/lib64/apache2/modules
checking for Apache include directory... -I/usr/include/apache2
checking for --with-python... no
checking for python... /usr/bin/python
checking Python version... 2.4
checking Python install prefix... /usr

checking for Py_NewInterpreter in -lpython2.4... yes

checking linker flags used to link Python...
checking where Python include files are... -I/usr/include/python2.4
./configure: line 3427: syntax error near unexpected token `('




uname -a


/usr/sbin/apache2 -v
Server version: Apache/2.0.55
Server built:   Jan 19 2006 15:46:57

/usr/sbin/apache2 -l
Compiled in modules:
  core.c
  prefork.c
  http_core.c
  mod_so.c

Python is 2.4.2



Please let me know if you need anymore info.

Thanks,

Sébastien


On Feb 5, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:

I hate to be the first one to report an issue with 3.2.7 tarball... It might be related to my lack of knowledge (just joined the dev list a few days ago), but here it is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/mod_python-3.2.7 $ ./configure --with-apxs=/ usr/sbin/apxs2 checking checking where python libraries are installed... /usr/ lib64/python2.4 checking what libraries Python was linked with... -lpython2.4 - lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm ./configure: line 3427: ` as_lineno_3=`(expr $as_lineno_1 + 1) 2>/ dev/null`' System is an Opteron 170 running Gentoo in 64 bit mode (2005.1 profile): Linux andromeda 2.6.14-gentoo-r5 #1 SMP Sun Jan 15 21:46:56 CST 2006 x86_64 Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 170 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux FYI, mod_python 3.1.4 configures, compiles and runs fine on the same system.

Mod_python 3.2.7 tarball is available for test. Here's hoping this will be to final time we need your help testing before the official release.

Here are the rules:


developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and

personally).

The files are (temporarily) available here:

http://www.modpython.org/dist/

Please download it, then do the usual

$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make install

Then (as non-root user!)

$ cd test
$ python test.py


output, and suggestions, if any).

Thank you for your assistance,
Jim Gallacher

3.2.7 adds a fix for the connection read issue that was causing problems on FreeBSD. In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_ list*! (Not the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, and preferably not me And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Python and Apache, the test

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part