On Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 22:05 Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> > Furthermore, IMHO "release" is better at communicating the > > per-interpreter nature than "close". > > Channels are a similar enough concept to pipes that I think > it would be confusing to have "close" mean "close for all > interpreters". Everyone understands that "closing" a pipe > only means you're closing your reference to one end of it, > and they will probably assume closing a channel means the > same. > FWIW, I'd compare channels more closely to queues than to pipes. -eric
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/BTOEUU7VAF55KZYPYHJJE4ZVWIEMNZNK/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
