On 09/10/2020 04.04, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote: > I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially > *before a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is > wrong, there's no need for a ban, at least not such a long one; if they > don't, they clearly aren't going to write it, at least not now (they > might later, after a few weeks or months, having cooled down and thought > it over). So all it would achieve is public shaming AFAICS. Same issue > with the threat of "zero tolerance policy" -- it's completely > unnecessary and only serves to humiliate and alienate the recipient.
I have been the victim of Stefan's CoC violations on more than one occasion. He added me to nosy list of a ticket just to offend and humiliate me. For this reason I personally asked the SC to make a sincere apology a mandatory requirement for Stefan's reinstatement as a core dev. I would have been fine with a private apology. However Stefan has also verbally attacked non-core contributors. In one case another core dev and I contacted the contribute in private to apologize and ensure that the contributor was not alienated by Stefan's attitude. Therefore it makes sense that the SC has requested a public, general apology. Why are you more concerned with the reputation of a repeated offender and not with the feelings of multiple victims of harassment? As a victim of Stefan's behavior I feel that an apology is the first step to reconcile and rebuild trust. Christian _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/LGYATAHYU2EL5BH4NPKKZQDIIGEVNXQL/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
