On 09/10/2020 15.48, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 05:04:55 +0300 > Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially *before >> a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is >> wrong, there's no need for a ban, at least not such a long one; if they >> don't, they clearly aren't going to write it, at least not now (they >> might later, after a few weeks or months, having cooled down and thought it >> over). So all it would achieve is public shaming AFAICS. Same >> issue with the threat of "zero tolerance policy" -- it's completely >> unnecessary and only serves to humiliate and alienate the recipient. > > That's my impression as well. Also, we now have an unmaintained module > (_decimal) requiring specific competence.
Please elaborate. I feel like you are insinuating something with your "unmaintained module" remark. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5KTGHFOGDYBUBD6JAC3A7QELDSIZYDLP/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
